Multi-paragraph composition rubric
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Rough Work |
Completely revised, and edited for style. All rough work and full outline
included. |
Many revisions. Mechanical and grammatical errors corrected. Some
rough work and full outline included. |
Shows some editing. Some basic errors remain. Some rough work
submitted. |
Little or no editing. Many errors overlooked. No outline or rough
work. |
|
Organization |
Introductory paragraph begins generally then develops toward a
thesis. Main paragraphs develop logically. Transitions are smooth and
unobtrusive. Conclusion restates thesis. Main points are reinforced. |
Introduction serves purpose, but isn�t strong.
Thesis could be clearer. Composition sticks to a main idea, develops that
idea, and wraps up. Transitions bring some sense of flow. |
Introduction is unclear or weak. Points are not developed in a very logical
manner. Minor points may be elaborated. |
Does not really have an introduction, thesis or concluding
paragraph. Starts nowhere and goes nowhere. Reads like a rough draft. |
____ |
Supporting Details |
Many relevant details and quotes that relate back to the main idea.
This gives a strong sense of focus. Details are vivid and accurate. Argument
is effective. |
Many relevant details that relate back to the main idea. Examples
and quotes are specific. Feels focused. |
Some relevant details that relate back to the main idea. Examples
are weak or irrelevant. Quotes not used or are inappropriate. Not very
focused. |
No relevant details that relate back to the main idea. Not focused. |
____ |
Style |
Includes concise, accurate phrasing and variety of sentence
structure. Vocabulary is rich and specific. Purpose clearly defined. Tone formal
and objective. |
Concise with some variety of sentence structure and vocabulary.
Purpose and audience quite clear. Language appropriate for the form. |
Wordy. Sentences choppy and simplistic. Tone inappropriately
informal. |
Wordy, repetitive, unclear. Phrasing awkward. Little information communicated. |
|
Content |
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic. Content is
thoughtful and engaging. All ideas are clearly developed. |
Brings a strong general knowledge base to topic. Commentary goes
beyond surface reading. Most ideas clearly developed. |
Content shows an understanding of topic, but commentary is
superficial. Leaves ideas underdeveloped. |
Shows little understanding of topic. May show basic comprehension errors. |
|
Mechanics and Grammar |
Few, if any, errors in punctuation, capitalization, and spelling,
and no grammatical errors. |
Few punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors
which do not interfere with meaning, and a couple of grammatical
errors. |
Some punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors, but they do
not interfere with meaning. Many grammatical errors. |
Many errors. It may be hard to comprehend in places. |
____ |
|
|
|
|
Total----> /24 |
____ |